Comparing: SU-100M1 vs. E 25
Developed at the UHMP (Ural Heavy Machinery Plant) on the basis of the T-34-85. The fighting compartment was located in the rear. The vehicle superceded by the SU-100M-2, based on the basis of the T-44, and never manufactured. |
The development of the E 25 was part of the "E" program, supervised by the Waffenprüfamt 6 committee. The E 25 was developed by the Argus company (Karlsruhe, Germany) under the supervision of Dr. Herman Klaue. No prototypes were manufactured. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VII | VII | |
Battle Tiers | 7 8 9 | 7 8 9 | |
Price | 1,365,000 | 6,700 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 50 km/h | 65 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 14 km/h | 20 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 20.50 % | % | |
In motion | 9.00 % | % | |
When Firing | 5.92 % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 67.4414 % | % | |
Neto Credits Income | -963.428 | ||
Winrate | 51.2261 % | % | |
Damage dealt | 768.082 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.734988 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |