Comparing: M22 Locust vs. Cruiser Mk. IV
Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development. |
An upgraded version of the cruiser tank Mk. III. The tank featured armor enhanced by the additional screens. The Cruiser Mk. IV fought in France in 1940 and in the early stages of the North African Campaign. This vehicle last saw action in the winter of 1941–1942. A total of 655 tanks were mass-produced. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | III | III | |
Battle Tiers | 3 4 5 | 3 4 5 | |
Price | 900 | 41,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 64 km/h | 48 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 20 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 18.00 % | % | |
In motion | 18.00 % | % | |
When Firing | 5.41 % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 58.4579 % | 40.8485 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 5266.65 | -285.403 | |
Winrate | 51.4349 % | 47.2574 % | |
Damage dealt | 141.171 | 105.511 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.485588 | 0.324125 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |