Comparing: T25 AT vs. M56 Scorpion
The T25 was developed on the basis of the T23 medium tank, but was never manufactured. |
The M56 SPG was intended to support airborne units as a light tank destroyer that could be transported by cargo planes or inserted by parachute or glider. The vehicle was mass produced from 1953 through 1959, but it was not popular and was soon replaced by the Sheridan light tank. The Scorpion was occasionally used to provide artillery support in Vietnam. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VII | VII | |
| Battle Tiers | 7 8 9 | 7 8 9 | |
| Price | 1,327,000 | 5,150 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 56 km/h | 45 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 15 km/h | 17 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 17.00 % | % | |
| In motion | 10.50 % | % | |
| When Firing | 4.90 % | % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 68.8012 % | % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 652.22 | ||
| Winrate | 50.579 % | % | |
| Damage dealt | 786.548 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.741006 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |