Comparing: SU-122-44 vs. T25 AT
Development was started in June 1944 by the Uralmash Design Bureau. The vehicle was based on the T-44 chassis and had a conventional configuration, with the front placement of the fighting compartment. In October, People's Commissariat of the Tank Industry considered the SU-122-44 project. In December the design project was ready. However, the SU-100M-2 with the rear placement of the fighting compartment was preferred. |
The T25 was developed on the basis of the T23 medium tank, but was never manufactured. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VII | VII | |
Battle Tiers | 7 8 9 | 7 8 9 | |
Price | 6,750 | 1,327,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 47.5 km/h | 56 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 13 km/h | 15 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 20.00 % | 17.00 % | |
In motion | 8.50 % | 10.50 % | |
When Firing | 5.40 % | 4.90 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 66.6222 % | 68.8012 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 10143.9 | 652.22 | |
Winrate | 51.8859 % | 50.579 % | |
Damage dealt | 983.926 | 786.548 | |
Kills per Battle | 1.03656 | 0.741006 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |