Comparing: SU-101 vs. T28
In 1944 the Construction Bureau of the Ural Heavy Machinery Plant developed the SU-101 with the D-10S gun and the SU-102 with the D-25S gun. Both vehicles were designated as Uralmash-1. Prototypes were manufactured in April 1945. The vehicles never entered mass production nor saw service. |
In March 1944, the U.S. Army placed an order for five prototypes of heavy vehicles designated T28. As a result, the T95 SPG was built. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VIII | VIII | |
| Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 10 | |
| Price | 2,560,000 | 2,580,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 54 km/h | 18 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 16 km/h | 7 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 20.00 % | 17.50 % | |
| In motion | 8.50 % | 8.00 % | |
| When Firing | 4.77 % | 5.28 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 68.7573 % | 71.6723 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -6147.78 | -3394.27 | |
| Winrate | 49.2481 % | 48.3225 % | |
| Damage dealt | 1074.44 | 1138.13 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.834577 | 0.786535 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |