Comparing: Object 261 vs. T92
Developed on the basis of the IS-7 by the design bureaus of the Kirov Plants in Chelyabinsk and Leningrad. The project was launched in 1947, but was canceled while still in the design phase. |
Development of the T92 started at the beginning of 1945. The vehicle was to share many components with the M26. A prototype underwent trials at Aberdeen Proving Ground, but the T92 never entered mass production. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | X | X | |
| Battle Tiers | 10 11 | 10 11 | |
| Price | 6,100,000 | 6,100,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 50 km/h | 32.2 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 10 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 2.50 % | 2.50 % | |
| In motion | 1.00 % | 1.00 % | |
| When Firing | 0.06 % | 0.13 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 40.862 % | 32.5468 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -15435.7 | -19451.3 | |
| Winrate | 48.2748 % | 46.6604 % | |
| Damage dealt | 1940.56 | 1771.98 | |
| Kills per Battle | 1.06214 | 0.943702 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |