Comparing: M22 Locust vs. Cruiser Mk. II vs. Cruiser Mk. IV
Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development.
The A10 Cruiser Mk. II was a further development of the A9 modification designed by John Carden. The A10 had enhanced armor and no machinegun turrets. A prototype was built in July 1937 and adopted for service as a heavy cruiser tank. A total of 175 vehicles were ordered between 1938–1939, which were manufactured by September 1940. The vehicles saw combat in France (1940), Greece (1941) and North Africa (1941).
An upgraded version of the cruiser tank Mk. III. The tank featured armor enhanced by the additional screens. The Cruiser Mk. IV fought in France in 1940 and in the early stages of the North African Campaign. This vehicle last saw action in the winter of 1941–1942. A total of 655 tanks were mass-produced.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||3 4 5||3 4 5||3 4 5|
|Speed Limit||64 km/h||40 km/h||48 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||20 km/h||15 km/h||20 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||18.00 %||12.00 %||%|
|In motion||18.00 %||8.50 %||%|
|When Firing||5.41 %||3.01 %||%|
|Accuracy||58.4579 %||40.6547 %||40.8485 %|
|Neto Credits Income||5266.65||2855.39||-285.403|
|Winrate||51.4349 %||48.658 %||47.2574 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.485588||0.478317||0.324125|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|