Comparing: M103 vs. E 75
The development started in 1948. In 1952 the order was placed for production of 300 vehicles to fight in the Korean War. The tank was designated as M103. |
In 1945 the E 75 was conceived as a standard heavy tank of the Panzerwaffe to replace the Tiger II. It existed only in blueprints. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | IX | IX | |
| Battle Tiers | 9 10 11 | 9 10 11 | |
| Price | 3,640,000 | 3,480,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 34 km/h | 40 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 15 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 6.25 % | 4.00 % | |
| In motion | 2.25 % | 1.00 % | |
| When Firing | 1.21 % | 0.70 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 77.2275 % | 76.5403 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -5594.57 | -5128.01 | |
| Winrate | 47.2464 % | 50.2046 % | |
| Damage dealt | 1314.27 | 1350.83 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.680142 | 0.724617 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |