Comparing: FCM 50 t vs. Caernarvon
Development was started in December 1945. The vehicle was conceived as an alternative for the AMX 50t and combined archaic features typical of the pre-war French tank-construction industry as well as German innovations. The vehicle was to be equipped with an additional container trailer, equipment for underwater driving, and a demountable mine clearer. |
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into the Conqueror heavy tanks. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VIII | VIII | |
Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 10 | |
Price | 11,900 | 2,520,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 51 km/h | 34.3 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 12 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | 6.00 % | |
In motion | % | 1.50 % | |
When Firing | % | 1.45 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | % | 72.6384 % | |
Neto Credits Income | -4495.68 | ||
Winrate | % | 48.8284 % | |
Damage dealt | 884.491 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.545338 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |