Comparing: E 25 vs. SU-100M1
The development of the E 25 was part of the "E" program, supervised by the Waffenprüfamt 6 committee. The E 25 was developed by the Argus company (Karlsruhe, Germany) under the supervision of Dr. Herman Klaue. No prototypes were manufactured. |
Developed at the UHMP (Ural Heavy Machinery Plant) on the basis of the T-34-85. The fighting compartment was located in the rear. The vehicle superceded by the SU-100M-2, based on the basis of the T-44, and never manufactured. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VII | VII | |
| Battle Tiers | 7 8 9 | 7 8 9 | |
| Price | 6,700 | 1,365,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 65 km/h | 50 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 14 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 20.50 % | |
| In motion | % | 9.00 % | |
| When Firing | % | 5.92 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | % | 67.4414 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -963.428 | ||
| Winrate | % | 51.2261 % | |
| Damage dealt | 768.082 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.734988 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |