Comparing: AT 8 vs. ARL V39
The vehicle was conceived as a breakthrough tank. The design project evolved from the AT-7 project, and both projects were submitted at the same time. No prototypes were built because the A39 Tortoise was preferred. |
A prototype of the ARL 40. The vehicle was intended as an assault SPG. Mass production was to be launched in 1940 but never started due to the occupation of France. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VI | VI | |
| Battle Tiers | 6 7 8 | 6 7 8 | |
| Price | 940,000 | 900,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 20 km/h | 42 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 10 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 17.00 % | |
| In motion | % | 11.00 % | |
| When Firing | % | 5.60 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 63.2568 % | 61.0415 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 3858.98 | 3656.15 | |
| Winrate | 50.8017 % | 46.9434 % | |
| Damage dealt | 499.341 | 471.183 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.648407 | 0.582692 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |