Comparing: AT 7 vs. E 25
Conceived as an assault breakthrough tank, this design was completed by June 10th, 1943. No complete prototypes were built. However, some parts and components of the AT7 were used in the A39 Tortoise. |
The development of the E 25 was part of the "E" program, supervised by the Waffenprüfamt 6 committee. The E 25 was developed by the Argus company (Karlsruhe, Germany) under the supervision of Dr. Herman Klaue. No prototypes were manufactured. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VII | VII | |
| Battle Tiers | 7 8 9 | 7 8 9 | |
| Price | 1,400,000 | 6,700 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 20 km/h | 65 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 10 km/h | 20 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | % | |
| In motion | % | % | |
| When Firing | % | % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 68.4254 % | % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -1157.69 | ||
| Winrate | 51.7412 % | % | |
| Damage dealt | 914.481 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.848547 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |