Comparing: AT 15 vs. ISU-152
Assault tank conceived to break through fortified positions. The design project was ready by the fall of 1943, but no prototypes were manufactured. However, the project became the basis for the A39 Tortoise heavy assault tank. |
Developed on the basis of the IS tank. The ISU-152 was conceived as a replacement for the SU-152, which was based on the KV-1s chassis. A total of 4,635 vehicles were built from November 1943 through June 1945. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VIII | VIII | |
| Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 10 | |
| Price | 2,650,000 | 2,520,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 20 km/h | 43 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 10 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 17.50 % | |
| In motion | % | 5.00 % | |
| When Firing | % | 3.95 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 70.9529 % | 69.134 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -7302.32 | 18.3596 | |
| Winrate | 50.0194 % | 47.934 % | |
| Damage dealt | 1163.27 | 1290.83 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.845163 | 0.91843 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |