Comparing: 112 vs. 110
The development of the 112 tank started in 1962. The project was to feature parts and components of medium and heavy tanks. Existed only in blueprints. The 113 tank was a further development of the 112. |
From the mid-1940s to the 1950s, Soviet engineers attempted to modernize the IS-2 tank. The IS-2U variant, developed in November 1944, was conceived to have a reinforced frontal hull with a plate configuration resembling that of the IS-3. In the mid-1950s the design project was passed to China and became the basis for further Chinese tank development. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VIII | VIII | |
Battle Tiers | 8 9 | 8 9 10 | |
Price | 10,500 | 2,600,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 45 km/h | 40 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 15 km/h | 15 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | 6.85 % | |
In motion | % | 3.47 % | |
When Firing | % | 1.07 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 72.2541 % | 74.7933 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 7263.72 | -5414.49 | |
Winrate | 49.4919 % | 49.5991 % | |
Damage dealt | 956.514 | 1070.53 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.689468 | 0.742719 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |