Comparing: Valentine AT vs. SU-76M
This experimental tank destroyer had the gun mounted in the middle of the hull behind a gun shield. A prototype was built, but work on the vehicle was discontinued when a new tank destroyer was developed, based on the Valentine and mounting the powerful 17-pounder. |
Light vehicle with a 76-mm gun, the most widely produced Soviet SPG. Despite its weak armor and armament, the vehicle was used to support infantry and cavalry. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | III | III | |
| Battle Tiers | 3 4 5 | 3 4 5 | |
| Price | 34,000 | 35,500 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 24 km/h | 48 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | % | |
| In motion | % | % | |
| When Firing | % | % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 43.497 % | % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 2482.73 | ||
| Winrate | 49.191 % | % | |
| Damage dealt | 157.335 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.545675 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |