Comparing: T67 vs. S35 CA
Development started in the spring of 1942. After trials in the fall of 1942, the decision was made to replace the 57-mm gun with a 75-mm gun. Two prototypes were manufactured. The vehicle saw neither mass production nor service. |
The design called for the conversion of tanks into tank destroyers by mounting a 17-pounder gun into an open-topped, lightly armored cabin. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | V | V | |
| Battle Tiers | 5 6 7 | 5 6 7 | |
| Price | 1 | 403,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 61 km/h | 37 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 17.75 % | |
| In motion | % | 14.25 % | |
| When Firing | % | 6.24 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | % | 60.7421 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 2342.36 | ||
| Winrate | % | 51.5669 % | |
| Damage dealt | 535.175 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.980826 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |