Comparing: T-50-2 vs. T-50
![]() The designs of the T-50 were submitted by the Construction Bureau of the Kirov Plant (Leningrad) and Plant 174. The design introduced by the Kirov Plant was more difficult to implement. The distinctive features of the vehicle were its hull shape and a horseshoe-shaped radiator. |
![]() Developed in October 1940. The design presented by Plant 174 was submitted for consideration. After successful trials in February and March 1941 the vehicle entered service. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | V | IV | |
Battle Tiers | 6 7 8 | 4 5 6 7 | |
Price | 725,000 | 140,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 72 km/h | 52 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 23 km/h | 20 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 20.00 % | 20.00 % | |
In motion | 20.00 % | 20.00 % | |
When Firing | 5.35 % | 5.54 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 62.0426 % | 45.13 % | |
Neto Credits Income | -3471.6 | 2461.68 | |
Winrate | 49.4837 % | 48.8203 % | |
Damage dealt | 190.348 | 71.1288 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.241663 | 0.139288 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |