Comparing: Pz.Kpfw. II Luchs vs. Valentine II
As compared to the Pz.Kpfw. II Ausf. C, the vehicle featured a new hull and turret, as well as a chassis with a staggered arrangement of roadwheels. The reconnaissance tank had strong characteristics, but only 131 vehicles of the L modification were built, after manufacture proved to be too expensive. |
A British tank supplied to the U.S.S.R. under Lend-Lease. A total of 3,782 vehicles were sent to the Soviet Union, with some lost at sea during transport to Murmansk. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | IV | IV | |
| Battle Tiers | 4 5 6 7 | 4 | |
| Price | 155,000 | 1,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 60 km/h | 32 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 22 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 20.00 % | |
| In motion | % | 20.00 % | |
| When Firing | % | 4.96 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | % | 66.8289 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 2147.73 | ||
| Winrate | % | 50.788 % | |
| Damage dealt | 277.848 | ||
| Kills per Battle | 0.928009 | ||
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |