Comparing: Pz.Kpfw. II Luchs vs. M5 Stuart
As compared to the Pz.Kpfw. II Ausf. C, the vehicle featured a new hull and turret, as well as a chassis with a staggered arrangement of roadwheels. The reconnaissance tank had strong characteristics, but only 131 vehicles of the L modification were built, after manufacture proved to be too expensive. |
A further modification of the M3 Stuart, the M5 entered production in April 1942. By June 1944 a total of 8,884 vehicles in two variants had been produced. The tank was used in all theaters of war. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | IV | IV | |
Battle Tiers | 4 5 6 7 | 4 5 6 7 | |
Price | 155,000 | 143,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 60 km/h | 64.4 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 22 km/h | 20 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | 20.00 % | |
In motion | % | 20.00 % | |
When Firing | % | 5.22 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | % | 44.3259 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 3431.67 | ||
Winrate | % | 48.9816 % | |
Damage dealt | 82.9116 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.199597 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |