Comparing: Object 416 vs. Chieftain/T95
The development of the Object 416 started at the Construction Bureau of Factory No. 75 in the fall of 1949. The blueprint was developed by March 1950. Due to technical problems with the turret, a working prototype was not ready until April 1952. Improvements were made, and another prototype was built in the summer of 1953, but the vehicle never entered mass production. |
Development of the FV4201 Chieftain allowed for the interchangeability of guns with the U.S. T95 tank by means of exchanging turrets. The project was discontinued because of numerous problems with training crews to master two artillery systems. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VIII | VIII | |
Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 10 | |
Price | 2,500,000 | 5 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 50 km/h | 42 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 15 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | % | |
In motion | % | % | |
When Firing | % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 72.4839 % | % | |
Neto Credits Income | -11842.6 | ||
Winrate | 51.4679 % | % | |
Damage dealt | 1113.57 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.863542 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |