Comparing: Marder II vs. FCM 36 Pak 40
Light tank destroyer developed in early 1942 based on the chassis of the outdated, but massively produced, Pz.Kpfw. II, and fitted with a powerful gun. The vehicle saw wide use on the Eastern Front; from 1944, it also fought in Italy and on the Western Front. The tank destroyer was in service until the end of the war. |
In 1943, ten FCM36 tanks were converted into tank destroyers. Earlier, 12 vehicles of this type were converted into self-propelled guns carrying a 105-mm gun. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | III | III | |
Battle Tiers | 3 4 5 | 3 4 5 | |
Price | 42,000 | 850 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 40 km/h | 24 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 10 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 23.00 % | 21.50 % | |
In motion | 17.00 % | 15.50 % | |
When Firing | 8.09 % | 7.57 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 44.3694 % | 58.5475 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 3109.51 | 4946.71 | |
Winrate | 49.0514 % | 55.334 % | |
Damage dealt | 146.127 | 337.314 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.462258 | 1.10826 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |