Comparing: M22 Locust vs. Pz.Kpfw. T 15
Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development. |
This experimental light tank was developed at the Škoda factory in 1941–1943, with a total of five prototypes manufactured. The vehicle was never mass-produced, nor saw service. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | III | III | |
| Battle Tiers | 3 4 5 | 3 4 5 | |
| Price | 900 | 900 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 64 km/h | 60 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 20 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 18.00 % | 17.50 % | |
| In motion | 18.00 % | 17.50 % | |
| When Firing | 5.41 % | 5.28 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 58.4579 % | 59.5756 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 5266.65 | 5223.6 | |
| Winrate | 51.4349 % | 54.9892 % | |
| Damage dealt | 141.171 | 136.774 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.485588 | 0.486145 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |