Comparing: M22 Locust vs. Cruiser Mk. II vs. Type 98 Ke-Ni Otsu
Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development.
The A10 Cruiser Mk. II was a further development of the A9 modification designed by John Carden. The A10 had enhanced armor and no machinegun turrets. A prototype was built in July 1937 and adopted for service as a heavy cruiser tank. A total of 175 vehicles were ordered between 1938–1939, which were manufactured by September 1940. The vehicles saw combat in France (1940), Greece (1941) and North Africa (1941).
A modification of the Type 98A Ke-Ni light tank with the Christie type suspension. Developed by Mitsubishi in 1939 under the influence of the Soviet BT-7. Only one prototype was manufactured.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||3 4 5||3 4 5||3 4 5|
|Speed Limit||64 km/h||40 km/h||50 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||20 km/h||15 km/h||20 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||18.00 %||12.00 %||%|
|In motion||18.00 %||8.50 %||%|
|When Firing||5.41 %||3.01 %||%|
|Accuracy||58.4579 %||40.6547 %||%|
|Neto Credits Income||5266.65||2855.39|
|Winrate||51.4349 %||48.658 %||%|
|Kills per Battle||0.485588||0.478317|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|