Comparing: M22 Locust vs. Cruiser Mk. II vs. BT-7
Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development.
The A10 Cruiser Mk. II was a further development of the A9 modification designed by John Carden. The A10 had enhanced armor and no machinegun turrets. A prototype was built in July 1937 and adopted for service as a heavy cruiser tank. A total of 175 vehicles were ordered between 1938–1939, which were manufactured by September 1940. The vehicles saw combat in France (1940), Greece (1941) and North Africa (1941).
The Soviet wheeled caterpillar tank used in the 1930s–1940s. The third vehicle in the series of the Soviet light BT tanks. The BT-7 differed from its predecessors in the welded hull of a modified shape and a new engine. A total of 5,556 vehicles of different variants were produced and saw action during the Khalkhyn Gol battles, Polish Campaign, Winter War and World War II.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||3 4 5||3 4 5||3 4 5|
|Speed Limit||64 km/h||40 km/h||65.4 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||20 km/h||15 km/h||20 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||18.00 %||12.00 %||%|
|In motion||18.00 %||8.50 %||%|
|When Firing||5.41 %||3.01 %||%|
|Accuracy||58.4579 %||40.6547 %||%|
|Neto Credits Income||5266.65||2855.39|
|Winrate||51.4349 %||48.658 %||%|
|Kills per Battle||0.485588||0.478317|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|