Comparing: KV-5 vs. 112
Development was started in June 1941 at the Leningrad Kirov Plant and completed by August, but the German invasion prevented development from progressing to the prototype stage. The KV-5 was expected to share some components with the KV-1. A new turret was designed, incorporating the 107-mm ZIS-6 gun. Early plans called for a new 1,200 hp diesel engine, but later adjustments, recognizing wartime disruptions, replaced this with two V-2K engines. |
The development of the 112 tank started in 1962. The project was to feature parts and components of medium and heavy tanks. Existed only in blueprints. The 113 tank was a further development of the 112. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VIII | VIII | |
Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 | |
Price | 1 | 10,500 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 40 km/h | 45 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 11 km/h | 15 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | % | |
In motion | % | % | |
When Firing | % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | % | 72.2541 % | |
Neto Credits Income | 7263.72 | ||
Winrate | % | 49.4919 % | |
Damage dealt | 956.514 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.689468 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |