Comparing: FV4202 vs. STB-1
Experimental tank on the basis of the Centurion medium tank. The vehicle was in development from 1956 through 1959, but never saw mass production. Technical decisions and innovations implemented in the FV4202 became the basis for the FV4201 Chieftain. |
In the early 1960s, Mitsubishi started development of a new tank that complied with government requirements for armament and defense. The first two prototypes of the STB-1 were manufactured in September 1969 for trials. In 1970 the prototypes were shown to journalists and participated in a military parade. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | X | X | |
Battle Tiers | 10 11 | 10 11 | |
Price | 6,100,000 | 6,100,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 40 km/h | 53 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 20 km/h | 20 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 13.00 % | % | |
In motion | 9.00 % | % | |
When Firing | 2.89 % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 76.2275 % | 75.2517 % | |
Neto Credits Income | -13504.9 | -20013.3 | |
Winrate | 51.6422 % | 53.7108 % | |
Damage dealt | 1835.03 | 2142.03 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.934631 | 1.106 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |