Comparing: FV215b vs. T110E5
Proposed plan for a heavy tank on the basis of the Conqueror Mk. II. Unlike the production model, this modification featured rear placement of the fighting compartment. No prototypes were manufactured. |
Developed from 1952 as a heavy tank with more powerful armament, compared to the T-43 (M103). Restrictions were placed on the vehicle sizing as the tank was supposed to pass through the narrow tunnels of the Bernese Alps. Several designs were considered, but the project was canceled. No vehicles were ever manufactured. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | X | X | |
Battle Tiers | 10 11 | 10 11 | |
Price | 6,100,000 | 6,100,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 34.3 km/h | 37 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 12 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 6.00 % | % | |
In motion | 3.00 % | % | |
When Firing | 1.10 % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 79.0912 % | % | |
Neto Credits Income | -18844.1 | ||
Winrate | 49.3562 % | % | |
Damage dealt | 1855.05 | ||
Kills per Battle | 0.892447 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |