Comparing: FV215b (183) vs. T110E3
This proposed heavy self-propelled gun utilized components of the Mk.II Conqueror. The vehicle featured the gun in a rear-mounted rotating turret. The project was canceled shortly after a dummy vehicle was built. |
In 1954, a conference on future heavy tanks was held in Detroit. Alongside other advanced projects, the Chrysler Corporation suggested a new tank on the basis of the TS-31 project. The main goal was to make the tank fit the Bern national tunnel. Several variants were considered, but the project was canceled. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | X | X | |
Battle Tiers | 10 11 | 10 11 | |
Price | 6,100,000 | 6,100,000 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 34.3 km/h | 24 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 8 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | % | % | |
In motion | % | % | |
When Firing | % | % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 71.4687 % | % | |
Neto Credits Income | -29322 | ||
Winrate | 48.9615 % | % | |
Damage dealt | 2238.15 | ||
Kills per Battle | 1.21818 | ||
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |