Comparing: Crusader vs. Cromwell
The Crusader was developed by Nuffield Mechanizations Ltd. from 1938 through 1940. More than 5,300 vehicles were mass-produced from 1941 through 1943. They were most extensively used in the North African сampaign in 1941–1942. |
The Cromwell was developed in 1941–1942 by BRC&W. A total of 1,070 vehicles were mass-produced from late 1943 through 1945. They were extensively used by the British Army in the Northwest Europe Campaign of 1944–1945. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | V | VI | |
| Battle Tiers | 6 7 8 | 6 7 8 | |
| Price | 380,000 | 900,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 44 km/h | 64 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 22 km/h | 20 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 19.00 % | 13.00 % | |
| In motion | 19.00 % | 10.00 % | |
| When Firing | 5.03 % | 3.06 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 53.9734 % | 61.0149 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 2793.34 | 4301.38 | |
| Winrate | 46.918 % | 49.1283 % | |
| Damage dealt | 223.273 | 488.713 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.441821 | 0.697794 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |