Comparing: Caernarvon vs. WZ-111
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into the Conqueror heavy tanks. |
Development of the heavy tank prototype on the basis of the Soviet IS-2 and IS-3 began in the early 1960s under the influence of the T-10. The vehicle was supposed to modernize the armored forces of the PLA. The trials revealed multiple faults, and the development of the vehicle was discontinued in 1964. |
||
Modules | |||
Auto select |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Turrets | |||
Guns | |||
Engines | |||
Suspensions | |||
Radios | |||
Main Characteristics | |||
Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
Tier | VIII | VIII | |
Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 10 | |
Price | 2,520,000 | 12,250 | |
Hit Points | |||
Signal range | |||
Speed Limit | 34.3 km/h | 50 km/h | |
Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 15 km/h | |
Weight | |||
Load limit | |||
Crew |
|
|
|
Armor | |||
Hull Armor |
|
|
|
Turret Armor | |||
|
|||
Mobility | |||
Engine Power | |||
Horse power / weight | |||
Traverse Speed | |||
Max Climb Angle | |||
Hard terrain resistance | |||
Medium terrain resistance | |||
Soft terrain resistance | |||
Fire Chance | |||
Engine Type | |||
Turret | |||
View Range | |||
Turret Traverse | |||
Traverse Arc | |||
Armament | |||
Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
Penetration | |||
Shell Price | |||
Shell Speed | |||
Damage / min | |||
Rate of Fire | |||
Reload time | |||
Clip | |||
Accuracy | |||
Aim time | |||
Elevation Arc | |||
Ammo Capacity | |||
Camo value | |||
Stationary | 6.00 % | 6.85 % | |
In motion | 1.50 % | 3.47 % | |
When Firing | 1.45 % | 1.04 % | |
Battle performance | |||
Accuracy | 72.6384 % | 74.1134 % | |
Neto Credits Income | -4495.68 | 5991.38 | |
Winrate | 48.8284 % | 48.1 % | |
Damage dealt | 884.491 | 1150.59 | |
Kills per Battle | 0.545338 | 0.799946 | |
More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats |