Comparing: Caernarvon vs. 112
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into the Conqueror heavy tanks. |
The development of the 112 tank started in 1962. The project was to feature parts and components of medium and heavy tanks. Existed only in blueprints. The 113 tank was a further development of the 112. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VIII | VIII | |
| Battle Tiers | 8 9 10 | 8 9 | |
| Price | 2,520,000 | 10,500 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 34.3 km/h | 45 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 12 km/h | 15 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | 6.00 % | % | |
| In motion | 1.50 % | % | |
| When Firing | 1.45 % | % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 72.6384 % | 72.2541 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | -4495.68 | 7263.72 | |
| Winrate | 48.8284 % | 49.4919 % | |
| Damage dealt | 884.491 | 956.514 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.545338 | 0.689468 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |