Comparing: 112 vs. Caernarvon
The development of the 112 tank started in 1962. The project was to feature parts and components of medium and heavy tanks. Existed only in blueprints. The 113 tank was a further development of the 112. |
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into the Conqueror heavy tanks. |
||
| Modules | |||
| Auto select |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Turrets | |||
| Guns | |||
| Engines | |||
| Suspensions | |||
| Radios | |||
| Main Characteristics | |||
| Tank data page | Tank data page | Tank data page | |
| Tier | VIII | VIII | |
| Battle Tiers | 8 9 | 8 9 10 | |
| Price | 10,500 | 2,520,000 | |
| Hit Points | |||
| Signal range | |||
| Speed Limit | 45 km/h | 34.3 km/h | |
| Speed Limit Back | 15 km/h | 12 km/h | |
| Weight | |||
| Load limit | |||
| Crew |
|
|
|
| Armor | |||
| Hull Armor |
|
|
|
| Turret Armor | |||
|
|
|||
| Mobility | |||
| Engine Power | |||
| Horse power / weight | |||
| Traverse Speed | |||
| Max Climb Angle | |||
| Hard terrain resistance | |||
| Medium terrain resistance | |||
| Soft terrain resistance | |||
| Fire Chance | |||
| Engine Type | |||
| Turret | |||
| View Range | |||
| Turret Traverse | |||
| Traverse Arc | |||
| Armament | |||
| Damage (Explosion radius) | |||
| Penetration | |||
| Shell Price | |||
| Shell Speed | |||
| Damage / min | |||
| Rate of Fire | |||
| Reload time | |||
| Clip | |||
| Accuracy | |||
| Aim time | |||
| Elevation Arc | |||
| Ammo Capacity | |||
| Camo value | |||
| Stationary | % | 6.00 % | |
| In motion | % | 1.50 % | |
| When Firing | % | 1.45 % | |
| Battle performance | |||
| Accuracy | 72.2541 % | 72.6384 % | |
| Neto Credits Income | 7263.72 | -4495.68 | |
| Winrate | 49.4919 % | 48.8284 % | |
| Damage dealt | 956.514 | 884.491 | |
| Kills per Battle | 0.689468 | 0.545338 | |
| More stats @ vbaddict.net | More stats | More stats | |