Comparing: Tiger II vs. VK 45.02 (P) Ausf. A vs. 110
The most heavily armored tank carrying the most powerful anti-tank gun. The vehicle's drawbacks included an overloaded suspension and engine-transmission group, as well as excessive general mass. When engaging enemy vehicles at long range, the Tiger II had an upper hand over any other vehicle in terms of the gun and armor protection. However, due to the excessive mass of the vehicle, relatively low durability of the engine and transmission, and small total number of vehicles built, the Tiger II did not have any significant impact on the course of war.
Development of this vehicle started in April 1942. The Krupp company received an order for construction of turrets. However, the prototype was never manufactured. The turrets were mounted on the first Tiger IIs.
From the mid-1940s to the 1950s, Soviet engineers attempted to modernize the IS-2 tank. The IS-2U variant, developed in November 1944, was conceived to have a reinforced frontal hull with a plate configuration resembling that of the IS-3. In the mid-1950s the design project was passed to China and became the basis for further Chinese tank development.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||8 9 10||8 9 10||8 9 10|
|Speed Limit||38 km/h||38 km/h||40 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||12 km/h||16 km/h||15 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||%||4.50 %||6.85 %|
|In motion||%||1.00 %||3.47 %|
|When Firing||%||0.95 %||1.07 %|
|Accuracy||%||73.1867 %||74.7933 %|
|Neto Credits Income||-2916.57||-5414.49|
|Winrate||%||47.2968 %||49.5991 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.600386||0.742719|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|