Comparing: T28 vs. AT 15 vs. SU-101
In March 1944, the U.S. Army placed an order for five prototypes of heavy vehicles designated T28. As a result, the T95 SPG was built.
Assault tank conceived to break through fortified positions. The design project was ready by the fall of 1943, but no prototypes were manufactured. However, the project became the basis for the A39 Tortoise heavy assault tank.
In 1944 the Construction Bureau of the Ural Heavy Machinery Plant developed the SU-101 with the D-10S gun and the SU-102 with the D-25S gun. Both vehicles were designated as Uralmash-1. Prototypes were manufactured in April 1945. The vehicles never entered mass production nor saw service.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||8 9 10||8 9 10||8 9 10|
|Speed Limit||18 km/h||20 km/h||54 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||7 km/h||10 km/h||16 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||17.50 %||%||20.00 %|
|In motion||8.00 %||%||8.50 %|
|When Firing||5.28 %||%||4.77 %|
|Accuracy||71.6723 %||70.9529 %||68.7573 %|
|Neto Credits Income||-3394.27||-7302.32||-6147.78|
|Winrate||48.3225 %||50.0194 %||49.2481 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.786535||0.845163||0.834577|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|