Comparing: T110E3 vs. FV215b (183) vs. Jagdpanzer E 100
In 1954, a conference on future heavy tanks was held in Detroit. Alongside other advanced projects, the Chrysler Corporation suggested a new tank on the basis of the TS-31 project. The main goal was to make the tank fit the Bern national tunnel. Several variants were considered, but the project was canceled.
This proposed heavy self-propelled gun utilized components of the Mk.II Conqueror. The vehicle featured the gun in a rear-mounted rotating turret. The project was canceled shortly after a dummy vehicle was built.
The E 100 was conceived as the basis for a self-propelled gun, an antiaircraft vehicle, and a tank destroyer. However, development was never started.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||10 11||10 11||10 11|
|Speed Limit||24 km/h||34.3 km/h||30 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||8 km/h||12 km/h||12 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|In motion||%||%||0.50 %|
|When Firing||%||%||0.51 %|
|Accuracy||%||71.4687 %||74.856 %|
|Neto Credits Income||-29322||-11414.7|
|Winrate||%||48.9615 %||49.9244 %|
|Kills per Battle||1.21818||0.990923|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|