Comparing: M22 Locust vs. LTP vs. Type 98 Ke-Ni Otsu

M22_Locust

Initially designed for airborne operations, the vehicle was never used as such by the U.S.A. during World War II. In the absence of a good air delivery system, the Ordnance Department became less enthusiastic about any further development.

LTP

A proposed light vehicle developed by Lieutenant Provornov in the summer of 1942. No prototypes were manufactured.

Ke_Ni_B

A modification of the Type 98A Ke-Ni light tank with the Christie type suspension. Developed by Mitsubishi in 1939 under the influence of the Soviet BT-7. Only one prototype was manufactured.

Modules
Auto select
Turrets
Guns
Engines
Suspensions
Radios
Main Characteristics
Tank data page Tank data page Tank data page Tank data page
Tier III III III
Battle Tiers 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5
Price 900 850 1,000
Hit Points
Signal range
Speed Limit64 km/h45.1 km/h50 km/h
Speed Limit Back20 km/h18 km/h20 km/h
Weight
Load limit
Crew
  • Commander (Radio Operator)
  • Gunner (Loader)
  • Driver
  • Commander (Gunner, Radio Operator)
  • Driver
  • Loader
  • Commander (Radio Operator, Loader)
  • Gunner
  • Driver
Armor
Hull Armor
Front:
25 mm
Side:
13 mm
Rear:
13 mm
Front:
30 mm
Side:
20 mm
Rear:
30 mm
Front:
16 mm
Side:
12 mm
Rear:
10 mm
Turret Armor
Mobility
Engine Power
Horse power / weight
Traverse Speed
Max Climb Angle
Hard terrain resistance
Medium terrain resistance
Soft terrain resistance
Fire Chance
Engine Type
Turret
View Range
Turret Traverse
Traverse Arc
Armament
Damage (Explosion radius)
Penetration
Shell Price
Shell Speed
Damage / min
Rate of Fire
Reload time
Clip
Accuracy
Aim time
Elevation Arc
Ammo Capacity
Camo value
Stationary18.00 % % %
In motion18.00 % % %
When Firing5.41 % % %
Battle performance
Accuracy58.4579 % % %
Neto Credits Income5266.65
Winrate51.4349 % % %
Damage dealt141.171
Kills per Battle0.485588
More stats @ vbaddict.net More stats More stats More stats