Comparing: AT 8 vs. Dicker Max vs. ARL V39
The vehicle was conceived as a breakthrough tank. The design project evolved from the AT-7 project, and both projects were submitted at the same time. No prototypes were built because the A39 Tortoise was preferred.
The Dicker Max ("Fat Max") was initially intended to destroy bunkers. Two prototypes were built in the spring of 1941. Later the vehicle was redesignated a heavy tank destroyer. The design was never put into mass production, but the prototypes fought on the Eastern Front.
A prototype of the ARL 40. The vehicle was intended as an assault SPG. Mass production was to be launched in 1940 but never started due to the occupation of France.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||6 7 8||6 7 8||6 7 8|
|Speed Limit||20 km/h||40 km/h||42 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||10 km/h||12 km/h||12 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||%||17.00 %||17.00 %|
|In motion||%||11.50 %||11.00 %|
|When Firing||%||5.06 %||5.60 %|
|Accuracy||63.2568 %||63.531 %||61.0415 %|
|Neto Credits Income||3858.98||10481||3656.15|
|Winrate||50.8017 %||47.0465 %||46.9434 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.648407||0.803134||0.582692|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|