Comparing: AT 7 vs. E 25 vs. SU-122-44
Conceived as an assault breakthrough tank, this design was completed by June 10th, 1943. No complete prototypes were built. However, some parts and components of the AT7 were used in the A39 Tortoise.
The development of the E 25 was part of the "E" program, supervised by the Waffenprüfamt 6 committee. The E 25 was developed by the Argus company (Karlsruhe, Germany) under the supervision of Dr. Herman Klaue. No prototypes were manufactured.
Development was started in June 1944 by the Uralmash Design Bureau. The vehicle was based on the T-44 chassis and had a conventional configuration, with the front placement of the fighting compartment. In October, People's Commissariat of the Tank Industry considered the SU-122-44 project. In December the design project was ready. However, the SU-100M-2 with the rear placement of the fighting compartment was preferred.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||7 8 9||7 8 9||7 8 9|
|Speed Limit||20 km/h||65 km/h||47.5 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||10 km/h||20 km/h||13 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|In motion||%||%||8.50 %|
|When Firing||%||%||5.40 %|
|Accuracy||68.4254 %||%||66.6222 %|
|Neto Credits Income||-1157.69||10143.9|
|Winrate||51.7412 %||%||51.8859 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.848547||1.03656|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|