Comparing: AT 7 vs. E 25 vs. SU-100M1
Conceived as an assault breakthrough tank, this design was completed by June 10th, 1943. No complete prototypes were built. However, some parts and components of the AT7 were used in the A39 Tortoise.
The development of the E 25 was part of the "E" program, supervised by the Waffenprüfamt 6 committee. The E 25 was developed by the Argus company (Karlsruhe, Germany) under the supervision of Dr. Herman Klaue. No prototypes were manufactured.
Developed at the UHMP (Ural Heavy Machinery Plant) on the basis of the T-34-85. The fighting compartment was located in the rear. The vehicle superceded by the SU-100M-2, based on the basis of the T-44, and never manufactured.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||7 8 9||7 8 9||7 8 9|
|Speed Limit||20 km/h||65 km/h||50 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||10 km/h||20 km/h||14 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|In motion||%||%||9.00 %|
|When Firing||%||%||5.92 %|
|Accuracy||68.4254 %||%||67.4414 %|
|Neto Credits Income||-1157.69||-963.428|
|Winrate||51.7412 %||%||51.2261 %|
|Kills per Battle||0.848547||0.734988|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|