Comparing: Caernarvon vs. Löwe vs. Tiger II
Development of this infantry support tank started in 1944. The first prototype was ready for trials in 1952. A total of 21 tanks were manufactured but never entered service. Some of the vehicles were later converted into the Conqueror heavy tanks.
Development of this 70-ton super-heavy tank started on November 1, 1941. In February 1942, the Krupp company suggested the VK 70.01 avant project, later designated the Löwe ("Lion"). Several designs varying in configuration, armament, and armor, were drafted. However, the project was canceled after the Führer made the decision to develop even heavier tanks. No prototypes were ever built.
The most heavily armored tank carrying the most powerful anti-tank gun. The vehicle's drawbacks included an overloaded suspension and engine-transmission group, as well as excessive general mass. When engaging enemy vehicles at long range, the Tiger II had an upper hand over any other vehicle in terms of the gun and armor protection. However, due to the excessive mass of the vehicle, relatively low durability of the engine and transmission, and small total number of vehicles built, the Tiger II did not have any significant impact on the course of war.
|Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page||Tank data page|
|Battle Tiers||8 9 10||8 9 10||8 9 10|
|Speed Limit||34.3 km/h||35 km/h||38 km/h|
|Speed Limit Back||12 km/h||15 km/h||12 km/h|
|Horse power / weight|
|Max Climb Angle|
|Hard terrain resistance|
|Medium terrain resistance|
|Soft terrain resistance|
|Damage (Explosion radius)|
|Damage / min|
|Rate of Fire|
|Stationary||6.00 %||4.50 %||%|
|In motion||1.50 %||1.00 %||%|
|When Firing||1.45 %||0.95 %||%|
|Accuracy||72.6384 %||74.2877 %||%|
|Neto Credits Income||-4495.68||19152.7|
|Winrate||48.8284 %||48.831 %||%|
|Kills per Battle||0.545338||0.611701|
|More stats @ vbaddict.net||More stats||More stats||More stats|